blog logo image

Archive for the ‘MFAN News’ Category

EVENT – The United States and Global Development: An Approach in Transition

Wednesday, February 13th, 2013
Bookmark and Share

The United State and Global Development: An Approach in Transition 

Tuesday, February 19, 2013, 2:00 — 3:30 pm

The Brookings Institution, Saul/Zilkha Rooms, 1775 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Washington, DC

As President Barack Obama begins his second term, the U.S. global development community is taking stock of the reform efforts that began in 2010 to elevate development—joining defense and diplomacy—as a core pillar of U.S. national security and foreign policy, while advancing proposals for what the administration should focus on going forward. In January 2013, the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN), a reform-minded coalition that is focused on advancing the effectiveness and impact of U.S. global development efforts, submitted its recommendations to President Obama.

On February 19, the Development Assistance and Governance Initiative at Brookings and MFAN will co-host a discussion on the current status and future of the U.S. global development reform agenda. Panelists will include: Sheila Herrling, vice president in the Department of Policy and Evaluation at the Millennium Challenge Corporation; Steven Radelet, distinguished professor in the practice of development at Georgetown University; Susan Reichle, assistant to the administrator at the Bureau of Policy, Planning and Learning at the U.S. Agency for International Development; and Connie Veillette, former director of the Rethinking U.S. Foreign Assistance Program at the Center for Global Development. Brookings Senior Fellow George Ingram will moderate the discussion.

After the program, the panelists will take audience questions.

Moderator

George Ingram, Senior Fellow

The Brookings Institution

 

Panelists

Sheila Herrling, Vice President

Department of Policy and Evaluation, Millennium Challenge Corporation

 

Steven Radelet, Distinguished Professor in the Practice of Development

School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University

 

Susan Reichle, Assistant to the Administrator

Bureau for Policy, Planning and Learning, U.S. Agency for International Development

 

Connie Veillette, Consultant 

 

To RSVP for this event, please call the Office of Communications at 202.797.6105 or click here.

 

 

Who Do YOU Think Should Serve on the Global Development Council?

Monday, January 7th, 2013
Bookmark and Share

Just before the holidays, the White House announced nominations for nine of the twelve seats on the President’s Global Development Council. As you recall, the Council—established by executive order last February—was originally called for in the 2010 Presidential Policy Directive on Global Development (PPD-6).

Click here to see the nine individuals appointed to the Council so far.

As MFAN Principal Sarah Jane Staats, director of the Rethinking U.S. Foreign Assistance Project at the Center for Global Development, writes, “The line-up so far pulls in research, private sector and philanthropic expertise and does not include operational or advocacy organizations (which may be a smart move to avoid conflict of interest with organizations who receive federal dollars for aid programs).”

Though the President is not obligated to fill all twelve slots, we’re interested to hear who you think should fill the remaining three seats.

Who else should be on the Global Development Council? Let us know by:

Send us your suggestions by January 14.

Once we’ve gotten enough suggestions, we will ask you to take our poll and vote on who you think should be on the Council. The names of the three individuals with the most votes will then be shared with the White House.

We look forward to collecting your nominations!

 

Community Supports Introduction of the Global Partnerships Act of 2012

Thursday, December 13th, 2012
Bookmark and Share

The Global Partnerships Act of 2012 (GPA), H.R. 6644, was introduced yesterday by Congressman Howard Berman (D-CA) with widespread support from the international development community. In working with Congressman Berman and his staff, development leaders were able to contribute their knowledge and expertise to help shape the much-needed rewrite of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. The bill enables government agencies who deliver foreign assistance to better address the challenges facing U.S. development programs in today’s world.

Moreover, the GPA is essential to codifying the foreign assistance reforms already underway within the U.S. government and seeks to ensure a continued effort in making foreign assistance more effective. The bill mandates: transparency and evaluation to learn from mistakes and inform future programs; better coordination within our own government, with the private sector, and with other donors to make programs more efficient; and long term-strategic planning to focus resources where they are most needed. It also puts partners in the driver’s seat by requiring consultation throughout the program planning process—emphasizing capacity building, and making it easier to work more directly with local organizations. These important and necessary reforms will allow the U.S. government to maximize its development impact and U.S. taxpayers’ dollars.

Don’t just take our word for it. Our partners spoke up about the bill as well:

“The Global Partnerships Act will bring U.S. assistance into the 21st century by establishing a coherent framework for streamlining cooperation between Congress, the executive branch, and civil society. By requiring a comprehensive U.S. Strategy for Global Development every four years, it will guarantee a foreign assistance strategy that is clear, specific and current.” Save the Children

“WWF is particularly pleased with the legislation’s recognition of the environment as a critical cross-cutting priority. America’s foreign assistance must clearly address the reality that environmental pressures and resource scarcities around the world increasingly affect American prosperity.” World Wildlife Fund

“This holistic approach recognizes the necessity of working closely with partner countries to build health systems that effectively tackle priority health needs. Skilled health workers are the backbone of any health system, so we welcome the legislation’s explicit support for the recruitment, training, retention, effectiveness ,and equitable distribution of skilled health workers,” Management Systems for Health

You can read more supportive statements below:

Bread for the World

Caucasus for Effective Foreign Assistance

Freedom House

Habitat for Humanity

InterAction

International Housing Coalition

Mercy Corps

Professional Services Council

Publish What You Fund

USGLC

Women Thrive Worldwide

 

USAID’s New Youth Policy Is Timely and Urgent: Here’s Why

Monday, November 5th, 2012
Bookmark and Share

In a piece in The Huffington Post, Bill Reese, MFAN Principal and CEO of the International Youth Foundation, applauds USAID’s new youth policy, Policy on Youth in Development. Reese highlights the policy’s efforts to elevate youth as partners and not just beneficiaries in their communities’ development process.

Reese writes:  “I frequently advocate that ensuring young people can find decent jobs or create their own livelihoods through entrepreneurship gives societies a 50-year ‘return on investment’. Those who can work their way out of poverty will gain the dignity and self confidence to be more actively engaged in their communities. As a result, they will contribute to society, both economically and civically, for decades to come, and their children will be far more likely to succeed in school and in the job market. Policy on Youth in Development buttresses this argument, by making young people’s ability to get a job and support their families a critical piece in USAID’s larger goal of boosting economic growth and reaching those at the base of the socio-economic pyramid. Our foundation’s programs focus on expanding opportunities for this same under-served population. Put into practice, this strategy can turn the demographic “bulge” into a meaningful demographic “dividend.””

 

We ask too much of the military

Thursday, November 1st, 2012
Bookmark and Share

In a new post on his “Foreign Policy” blog, The Sheathed Sword, Gordon Adams writes about the breakdown of civilian and military work—and how the U.S. increasingly relies on its military for development programs over trained development practitioners. See below for excerpts from this strong piece:

“We have a foreign assistance force; it is called the U.S. Agency for International Development, which operates with the assistance of the State Department. But over the past ten years or so, we have larded up our military with missions that USAID and State should be doing — development, governance support, social support, training for ministries, public diplomacy.”

“It is the wrong approach to assistance because, for all the vaunted Seabee capability, they are not a development force; they are not “best practiced” in development. They do not, and cannot put such construction into the context of Cambodia’s development and governance needs; they can just sweep in and “do good.” But that may have little to do with what the Cambodians actually need; Seabees have no competence in that area. As too many projects in Iraq and Afghanistan show, the short-term effort to “win hearts and minds” backfires when the schools lack teachers and material; the clinics lack doctors and medicines. In other words, the Seabees have no way to ensure the advisability or sustainability of such projects.