blog logo image

Archive for the ‘USAID’ Category

Secretary Clinton Defends FY’12 Budget Request to HFAC

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011
Bookmark and Share

Clinton FY'12 HFAC

Yesterday Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testified in front of the House Foreign Affairs Committee to defend President Obama’s FY’12 budget request for the State Department and USAID. After opening statements from Chairman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), Ranking Member Howard Berman (D-CA) and Clinton, the committee immediately jumped to a marathon question and answer session—bringing the hearing to a near 4-hour mark. Most of the questions from Republicans and Democrats focused on the revolutions in the Middle East, particularly Libya. Secretary Clinton used this context as a jumping off point to make an eloquent defense of U.S. assistance and development programs and generally how the situation makes it even more important that we use every tool in our national security strategy to affect change.

In her opening statement HFAC Chairman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen criticized the Administration for not doing more to foster the democracy movements in the Middle East, saying “We have failed to effectively use our resources to help build strong, accountable institutions that protect basic human rights.” Ros-Lehtinen discussed the UN Human Rights Council and called for conditioning U.S. funding: “Just as administration officials talk about smart power and smart sanctions, when it comes to the U.N., we need smart withholding.”  She also challenged the Administration to consider its “mis-placed priorities” arguing, “The Administration should not propose massive increases in global health and climate change while cutting key programs like counter-terrorism programs.” After running through some constituent letters that ask “what is the return on our investment?” Ros-Lehtinen closed with a forceful message:  “Our funding baseline has to change. The real question is not, is this activity useful? But rather, is this activity so important that it justifies borrowing money to pay for it and further endangering our nation’s economy?”


MFAN Statement: Budget Landscape Increases Urgency of Foreign Assistance Reform

Monday, February 14th, 2011
Bookmark and Share

February 14, 2011 (WASHINGTON)This statement is delivered on behalf of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN) by Co-Chairs David Beckmann, George Ingram, and Jim Kolbe:

As Congress begins debate this week on funding the government for the remainder of 2011, we support current spending levels in the international affairs budget. Foreign assistance is not a nice-to-have perk in a world where complex challenges defy narrow solutions; it is a must-have pillar of our foreign policy alongside diplomacy and defense. In addition, now more than ever, foreign assistance reform must move forward, in order to make sure we can get the most out of every dollar we spend on development.

We are acutely aware of the dangers a growing deficit and debt-to-GDP ratio pose to economic growth and security in the United States.  But disproportionately drastic cuts in the foreign assistance budget being considered by the House of Representatives this week would undo a decade’s worth of progress against global poverty and disease, and adversely affect our security, prosperity, and leadership in the world.

For around 1% of the federal budget, experts from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Millennium Challenge Corporation, and other agencies are empowered to work hand-in-hand with our diplomats and members of the Armed Forces to help build accountable institutions and increase stability in “frontline” states like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Somalia, and Yemen.  These professionals are also deployed to help boost private-sector and middle-class growth and reduce poverty in developing countries, the fastest-growing markets in the world. Our development efforts in these countries are crucial to opening up export opportunities for American businesses and building stable, long-term trading partners and allies. Were we to pull back, the void left behind would surely be filled by other countries that do not share our values.

We must also finish the job of implementing the serious reforms to U.S. foreign assistance that have been pushed forward on a bipartisan basis over the last decade.  The focus now should be on two key actions, which will increase the effectiveness of all of our development programs, particularly marquee efforts like the Global Health Initiative and the Feed the Future agricultural development program:

  • Enacting USAID Forward: To transform USAID into a modern development enterprise so that it can make the best use possible of limited resources and achieve more dynamic results, the budget should provide strategic resources for strengthening accountability and evaluation; changing inefficient procurement practices; and investing in innovation, science, and technology.
  • Implementing the President’s Landmark Development Policy: To ensure that all U.S. development activities are more coordinated, efficient, and effective, the budget should focus resources on bolstering economic growth and democratic governance around the world, while at the same time being more selective about who gets our assistance and cutting programs in places where U.S. partners are ready to take more ownership and responsibility.

We call on the Administration and Congress to work together to complete the reforms and build a modern development enterprise for the U.S., so that we can maximize the returns on our development investments at a time of complex budgetary and geopolitical challenges.

Nides Briefing on FY’12 State and USAID Budget

Monday, February 14th, 2011
Bookmark and Share

In case you missed it, watch the clip below for Deputy Secretary Thomas Nides’ briefing on the FY’12 budget request for the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

MFAN Members Set the Scene for Budget Day

Monday, February 14th, 2011
Bookmark and Share

As President Obama’s FY’12 budget proposal is released and the details start to crystallize around the FY’11 Continuing Resolution, MFAN Principals and Partners are hard at work defending the International Affairs budget and our development programs from severe cuts. See some clips below:

Sam WorthingtonIn an op-ed for The Guardian today, MFAN Principal and InterAction President Sam Worthington outlines key reasons why Republicans in the House should not cut foreign assistance, citing critical support from the military and private philanthropists. Worthington points at the Obama Administration’s efforts to reform foreign assistance amidst attempts to cut programs and offices: “This new pressure point on the foreign aid budget comes as the administration is trying to reform the US development agency. To implement those reforms will need investment, not turning off the spigot. If a group of more conservative Republicans get their way, they will eliminate federal funding for the US Agency for International Development (USAid).”

On Saturday, Worthington argued that any attempts to cut foreign assistance would be “penny-wise and pound foolish” in an op-ed for the National Review. Worthington described foreign assistance as an investment, writing, “Foreign assistance is a down payment for U.S. national security in that it helps to create a more stable and secure world. Investing in societies now reaps rewards for years to come and helps avert future military conflicts, which cost much more in blood and national treasure. Development is a key component of foreign policy strategy and must not be an afterthought.” He closed his piece by noting the power of American generosity and the need to resist being “stingy” in a complex world.

A Miami Herald column by Andres Oppenheimer cites MFAN Partner the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition’s analysis of the budget to make his own case against cuts to the State/USAID budget—calling such cuts “diplomatic suicide.” He also references an interview with Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY) who said skimping on this investment now “will come back to bite us.” Read more of his column here.

USAID IMPACT Blog: Forming a Strong Partnership with Brazil

Friday, February 11th, 2011
Bookmark and Share

See below for a  post from Mark Lopes, Deputy Assistant Administrator for the Latin America and Caribbean Bureau at USAID. Lopes’ post, which first appeared on USAID’s Impact Blog, discusses a recent agreement made between USAID and its Brazilian counterpart that will leverage the partner countries’ collective resources to fight poverty and promote economic growth.

Photo Credit: USAID/Brazil

Photo Credit: USAID/Brazil

Staff Exchange Program Deepens Relationship Between Brazil and U.S.

By Mark Lopes, Deputy Assistant Administrator, USAID/ Latin America and Caribbean Bureau

The US and Brazil took another step yesterday toward deepening our joint efforts in developing countries,  with the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding to formalize a staff exchange program between USAID and the Brazilian Cooperation Agency (ABC). Starting in April 2011, USAID will have a staff member working in ABC’s offices and vice versa. The program will facilitate peer-to-peer learning and create more opportunities to jointly leverage US and Brazilian assistance in third countries.

The USG’s trilateral arrangements with Brazil are a reflection of that country’s emergence as a global economic and diplomatic force and a net donor to development.

For the United States, the more donors with whom we can collaborate to address some of the world’s most intractable problems, the more we advance our national interests and provide paths out of poverty. In Brazil, we have a partner who shares our commitment to advancing global development; and who has come up with effective and innovative approaches to tackling some of the very same challenges facing developing countries in Latin America and the Caribbean and Africa.

Through the staff exchange program, we are continuing to put into practice President Obama’s commitment to an equal partnership with the countries of this hemisphere, based on mutual respect, common interests and shared values.