blog logo image

Posts Tagged ‘Afghanistan’

Kerry & Lugar Deliver Message to Obama: Time is of the Essence for a USAID Administrator

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009
Bookmark and Share

4609_image_sheila_herrling_155w

As part of the Center for Global Development’s newly launched blog – Rethinking U.S. Foreign Assistance – MFAN Principal and CGD Senior Policy Analyst Sheila Herrling highlights a recent letter from Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry (D-MA) and Ranking Member Dick Lugar (R-IN) urging President Obama to name a nominee to the vacant Administrator post at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

MFAN Principal and former USAID Administrator Brian Atwood also comments extensively about the current state of USAID in Foreign Policy’s The Cable.atwood

In the letter, Kerry and Lugar state they “firmly believe that development is integral to our national security and must be elevated to an equal role alongside defense and diplomacy.”  However, their “efforts to support a bold foreign assistance reform and development agenda are hampered by a leadership vacuum” at USAID.

The Senators further caution the President “that the longer we wait for a new leader for the Agency, the more serious the problems become.”

In her blog post, Herrling writes, “…the letter also communicates a broader concern that development voices are being shut out of major policy decisions and interagency processes at a time when U.S. leadership on development is more needed than ever.  Referencing the greatest foreign policy challenges facing America today — wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and instability in Pakistan — the Senators argue it is ‘essential to empower a single development agency with the appropriate tools, resources and policy voice so that it can undertake its responsibilities in an effective and capable manner.’”

She goes on to say, “The letter’s call for a ‘single development agency’ with a ‘policy voice’ harkens back to a portion of the Senators’ legislation that would restore development policy and planning capacity to USAID, distinct from that of the State Department.  I fear that without that capacity restored and without a healthy degree of budget authority delegated, filling the Administrator and senior management posts with the caliber of experience necessary to present long-term development options into what are typically short-term decisionmaking processes (let alone implement them) will be difficult.”

Noteworthy News – 9.15.09

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009
Bookmark and Share

This weekly posting includes key news stories and opinion pieces related to foreign assistance reform and the larger development community.

What we’re reading this week:  Afghanistan, Afghanistan, Afghanistan. And the fall congressional outlook on foreign assistance.

  • Afghanistan: Going long or going home (ForeignPolicy.com-Ian Bremmer, September 10) - Within the Obama foreign-policy team, there looks to be a growing divergence of opinion on what to do next. There appears to be an internal consensus that the current strategy isn’t working. But senior officials appear more divided on whether to “go long” or “go home.” In the go long group, those who want more troops and more resources because “failure isn’t an option,” we see Secretary Clinton, envoy Richard Holbrooke, most of the generals on the ground, and most Republicans in Congress. In the go home camp, those who want to pull troops out before things get much worse, are Vice President Biden, most of Obama’s political team, and a growing number of senior Democrats. Even Defense Secretary Robert Gates appears to have grown much more skeptical.
  • It’s the corruption, stupid! (The Washington Times-Rep. Jane Harman, September 10) - But electoral fraud is merely a symptom of a much graver problem plaguing the country — the failure to establish good governance. Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal appears to understand this. His emphasis on joint civilian-military efforts to improve governance is much needed, but the American people deserve some accountability. Congress should not even be asked about more troops without first being shown evidence that some anti-corruption metrics have been achieved, not just announced.
  • Afghanistan’s ‘civilian surge’ fizzles (The Christian Science Monitor-Gordon Lubold, September 13) - But when it comes to Afghanistan, the problem is that a “civilian surge” probably won’t happen. “We don’t have any more capacity now than we did,” says one former aide on the Pentagon’s Joint Staff who didn’t want to speak publicly on a politically sensitive matter. In Afghanistan, the former aide predicts, “They will make the same commitment and have the same lack of follow-through.”  There are some reasons to be optimistic about the future, with the State Department developing an expeditionary ” civilian response corps” ready to deploy quickly to hot spots around the world. But that effort will take time. For now, America’s apparent inability to deliver a robust civilian surge threatens to undermine any military progress.
  • Senate Foreign Relations Committee sneak peek (ForeignPolicy.com-The Cable, September 8 ) - From there, Jones expects the “blistering pace” of hearings to slow slightly as Senator Kerry focuses on two issues: Afghanistan and climate change.  “[The chairman] is very concerned [about Afghanistan],” Jones said, “on whether America is finding the most effective solutions to the challenges there and whether they are pursuant to our national-security interests.” Also a high priority, Jones said, is passing of an aid bill for Pakistan — of which there are currently House (sponsored by Rep. Howard Berman (D-CA)) and Senate versions (sponsored by Senator Kerry and Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.)

MFAN: New Presidential Study Directive an Unprecedented Step Forward on Development

Monday, August 31st, 2009
Bookmark and Share

August 31, 2009 (WASHINGTON) – This statement is delivered on behalf of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN) by Co-Chairs David Beckmann and George Ingram:

MFAN strongly commends President Obama for signing a landmark Presidential Study Directive on Global Development Policy.  The directive establishes clear White House leadership on modernizing our country’s approach to global development, adding to the tremendous momentum generated by actions taken by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the State Department.

This critical step by President Obama means that we are closer than we have ever been to a fresh, whole-of-government approach that will elevate development as a core, independent pillar of U.S. foreign policy and make U.S. efforts to alleviate poverty and hunger, fight disease, and create economic opportunity  in the developing world more efficient and effective.  As the U.S. faces complex global challenges including the economic crisis and conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan-Pakistan, as well as threats emanating from scourges that know no borders – such as poverty, disease, and climate change – we must make sure our efforts to promote development have as much impact as possible.

President Obama’s directive acknowledges this reality and the interconnectedness of the threats we face, and rises to the challenge by taking the unprecedented step of tasking National Security Advisor General James Jones and Larry Summers, Director of the National Economic Council, with leading an interagency review of global development policy.  This process will provide much-needed clarity about how U.S. agencies and departments can work together to develop and implement coordinated and sound policy aimed at achieving our global development goals.  We are optimistic about what this effort can achieve in conjunction with the State Department’s recently announced Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review, and we remain ready to support both the White House and State Department teams in any way we can.

For more information, please visit MFAN’s website.

Contact: Sam Hiersteiner at shiersteiner@gpgdc.com or 202-295-0171.