blog logo image

Posts Tagged ‘development’

State Department Strategic Review of Development and Diplomacy Holds Great Promise

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009
Bookmark and Share

July 10, 2009 (WASHINGTON)This statement is delivered on behalf of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN) by Co-Chairs David Beckmann and George Ingram:

MFAN commends Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her decision to undertake America’s first-ever Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review (QDDR), which is further evidence that she is more committed to development than any Secretary of State in history.

In particular, we are hopeful that the QDDR will help the Obama Administration ensure its efforts to alleviate poverty, fight disease, and create political stability and economic opportunity in the developing world are coordinated, effective, and integrated into major foreign policy and national security debates. In an era of complex and interconnected challenges, this is critical.

The QDDR should also be a crucial step towards modernizing the outdated foreign aid system to ensure that U.S foreign assistance is effective; responsive to the needs and priorities of aid recipients; monitored and evaluated according to clear benchmarks; and transparent to U.S. taxpayers, partners, and recipients alike. And we are hopeful it will include recommendations for ensuring that the U.S. commitment to pursuing long-term development goals is sustained even when immediate diplomatic and humanitarian challenges arise.

To get the most from the QDDR process, we hope the State Department will take the following steps:

  • The Obama Administration should immediately name an experienced development professional as Administrator for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). This person should co-chair the QDDR process, and should be given a seat on the National Security Council from which to help align the findings of the QDDR with U.S. foreign policy.
  • In completing the QDDR, the State Department should examine all aspects of U.S. development policy, gathering input from, and seeking to align the policies of, agencies across the government that impact the U.S. approach to global development.
  • The QDDR process must include input from a broad range of relevant stakeholders, including implementing partners, field professionals in and out of government, policy experts, other bilateral and multilateral donors, and aid recipients.

MFAN members look forward to supporting the State Department as it undertakes the QDDR.

Contact: Sam Hiersteiner at 202-337-0808 or shiersteiner@gpgdc.com

For more information, please visit www.modernizeaid.net.

Call by Former Secretaries of State for Robust Development and Diplomacy Funding

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009
Bookmark and Share

June 25, 2009 (Washington, DC) - This statement is delivered on behalf of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN) by Co-Chairs David Beckmann and George Ingram:

Today, eight former Secretaries of State published a Politico column calling for Congress to provide more robust funding for development and diplomacy and bring these civilian instruments of U.S. foreign policy into better balance with national defense efforts.  Perhaps most importantly, the former Secretaries said, “Providing the personnel and financial resources to manage our diplomacy and development policies is an urgent matter of national security.”

MFAN strongly supports this call, particularly as it relates to strengthening the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), America’s premier development agency which works to alleviate poverty, fight disease, and, as the signatories of the column said, help “developing countries achieve rapid, sustained and broad-based economic growth.”  As they also said, “such efforts are critical to helping us weather the worldwide recession that grips us.”

We agree, and would go further. We believe that providing robust funding and resources for development is only part of the recipe for changing the way the U.S. engages with the world and addressing the urgent challenges we face.  We must also modernize the U.S. foreign assistance system – our primary mechanism for carrying out development – in order to make sure that any resources committed to these efforts are spent effectively and get into the hands of people who need help most.  This will be a big challenge, due to the fact that the foreign assistance system has more than 60 different government offices carrying out development programs.  The legislation governing the system has not been updated in two decades.  The Obama Administration and Congress can change this situation by passing a strong FY10 International Affairs Budget and taking these key steps towards modernization:

  • Immediately naming an experienced and savvy USAID Administrator, and giving that person a   seat at the National Security Council so that he/she can bring a high-level development voice to critical foreign policy discussions;
  • Incorporating the Administrator into the process of developing America’s first-ever, government-wide National Strategy for Global Development, a move supported by House Committee on Foreign Affairs Chairman Howard Berman (D-CA), who introduced bipartisan legislation (H.R. 2139) on the topic (which now has 53 bipartisan co-sponsors);
  • Clarifying the Administrator’s role in relation to other agencies involved in U.S. foreign assistance, including the State Department, MCC, and PEPFAR; and,
  • Empowering the Administrator to rebuild the policy and budget planning capacity at USAID, as well as restore the technical development expertise at the agency.

For more information, please visit www.moderizeaid.net.