blog logo image

Posts Tagged ‘economic growth’

GOP Voices Make the Case for Effective Foreign Aid

Friday, January 28th, 2011
Bookmark and Share

Daily Caller logoFormer Ambassador to Tanzania and Congressman from Wisconsin Mark Green, Managing Director of the Malaria No More Policy Center, along with MFAN Co-Chair and former Republican Arizona Congressman Jim Kolbe, Senior Transatlantic Fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States and a Senior Advisor to McLarty Associates, and MFAN Principal and former President and CEO of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) Rob Mosbacher, Chairman of the Mosbacher Energy Company of Texas, put forth a strong defense for foreign assistance in a new op-ed in The Daily Caller. Green, Kolbe and Mosbacher urge policymakers to not cut short the achievements that aid has delivered over the last decade by slashing the budget, and instead focus on making US foreign assistance more efficient and effective—creating tremendous opportunities for the US to build markets and generate stability worldwide. Read the full op-ed below.

The Daily Caller

More effective foreign assistance can pay real dividends

Mark Green, Jim Kolbe, and Rob Mosbacher

January 28, 2011

As a new Congress gets into gear, both Republicans and Democrats have a solemn duty to do the people’s work and to make sure their taxpayer dollars are being spent wisely. U.S. foreign assistance is already under the microscope, as it should be, but we believe policymakers should focus on making it better instead of slashing budgets. Foreign assistance accounts for less than 1% of our federal budget, and our investments in it can pay real dividends for the cost.

The world has changed dramatically even in the last decade, becoming more interconnected and full of challenges that defy narrow solutions. Our foreign assistance is a projection of our responsible leadership in the world; it is more important than ever to our security and economic interests. We must take the politics out of this debate and get down to the facts.

In terms of our national security, we provide extensive counter-terrorism and counterinsurgency assistance to “frontline states” such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen. These civilian-led programs help build and train national army and police forces, support democracy and the rule of law, and improve destitute living conditions that can fuel extremism and anti-American sentiment.

Military leaders from Secretary of Defense Gates to Joint Chiefs Chairman Mullen to Afghanistan Commander Petraeus have issued strong calls for strengthening civilian programs that take some of the burdens off of our war fighters, with Gates saying recently that helping countries develop “is a lot cheaper than sending soldiers.”

(more…)

MFAN: Reflecting on the 50th Anniversary of Kennedy’s Inaugural

Thursday, January 20th, 2011
Bookmark and Share

Today, 50 years ago, President Kennedy delivered an inaugural address that set the tone for US engagement for decades to come. Through the address Kennedy sought to renew US leadership in the world, guided by a moral imperative to oppose those who limit opportunity and freedom. Kennedy said, “If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.” These words then paved the way for the first-ever Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and the establishment of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) – commemorating its 50th anniversary this year.   The best way to celebrate President Kennedy’s infamous address is to build on his legacy for alleviating poverty worldwide by strengthening USAID, while reforming and refocusing our efforts to meet present day challenges. See below for excerpts from Kennedy’s speech that speak to the national security and moral reasons why America has an obligation to fight poverty:

“To those people in the huts and villages of half the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is required — not because the Communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right.”

“To our sister republics south of our border, we offer a special pledge: to convert our good words into good deeds, in a new alliance for progress, to assist free men and free governments in casting off the chains of poverty.”

“My fellow citizens of the world, ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.”

How Global Health R&D Can Be a Bipartisan Tool for Economic Development & Diplomacy

Wednesday, January 19th, 2011
Bookmark and Share

A guest post by David Cook

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI)

As a new Congress and the Obama Administration look for high value in government investments as they convene for the State of the Union address Tuesday, they should consider the proven value of investments in biomedical research and development to address the major diseases and health issues facing the world.

Today, in a speech at the Center for Global Development, Dr. Rajiv Shah, Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), outlined the agency’s plans to modernize aid, including harnessing the potential of science and technology for game-changing innovations that would save lives, reduce costs, and foster growth both in the U.S. and in the developing world. USAID is working with other government agencies to “build on recent advances in science and technology, especially in high return areas such as vaccinating children, preventing HIV, malaria and TB and focusing on childhood nutrition during pregnancy and the first two years of life,” Shah said.

The U.S. has long held an advantage in science and technology, and its biotechnology industry is driving innovation to make lifesaving products – including cheaper and more widely available flu vaccines and novel vaccines for dengue virus – to protect hundreds of millions of people around the world. Health innovations that emerge from R&D also yield cost savings and economic improvements. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates the U.S. has saved more than $3 billion since investing $32 million in the global campaign to eradicate smallpox because expenditures for smallpox treatment and vaccination are no longer needed.

IAVI_Logo_verticalGlobal health R&D also is putting people to work across the U.S. at research centers, academic institutions and biotech companies. For every $1 million the National Institutes of Health (NIH) spent on R&D in fiscal 2007, $2.21 million was generated in business activity in the U.S., according to Families USA. In Washington state alone, global health endeavors generate $4.1 billion of business activity, and nearly 3,700 residents work in global health research or service delivery, according to Research!America.

In addition, global health R&D can strengthen scientific and technological skills and infrastructure in developing countries, which can contribute to creating more vibrant economies. Economists examining trends from 1960 to 2000 found that, on average, $1 of science and technology investment resulted in a $0.78 increase in GDP, with developing countries reaping higher returns than industrialized countries. Some countries, such as China, India, and South Korea, earned returns on scientific investment of more than 100 percent. By making people healthier, the innovations produced by global health R&D also make economies stronger. Health economists have attributed up to 15 percent of the economic growth in developing countries from 1960 to 1990 to reductions in mortality.

Today, diseases that significantly impact the developing world require reforms that spur innovative new solutions. HIV/AIDS, which has been shown to decrease life expectancy and slow economic growth in highly impacted countries, is one significant example. While access to antiretroviral drugs has rapidly expanded in low- and middle-income countries enabling millions of people to lead productive lives, for every person who goes on treatment, two more are newly infected with HIV. Plainly, new methods of HIV prevention are needed if we are to sustain the progress made in stabilizing the most affected countries.

Thankfully, tremendous progress made over the last 18 months offers hope that R&D investments will produce those new methods and yield ways to eventually end the AIDS pandemic. In the fall of 2009, a trial in Thailand, a joint project of the U.S. and Thai governments, demonstrated that a vaccine can prevent transmission of HIV. The vaccine candidate showed a moderate efficacy of 31 percent. The quest for an AIDS vaccine has been further buoyed by discoveries by researchers at and affiliated with the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative and the Vaccine Research Center of the NIH of several new antibodies that neutralize a broad swath of HIV variants, giving scientists targets that are valuable in designing a potentially highly effective vaccine. In mid-2010, South African researchers announced that in a trial funded by USAID a vaginal microbicide gel containing the antiretroviral drug tenofovir had reduced HIV infections in women by 39 percent. Finally, recent results from a global study funded in part by the NIH found that taking as a prophylactic a combination pill currently used to treat HIV reduced the risk of HIV infection by 44 percent among men who have sex with men.

These results provide evidence that science and technology, if properly funded and focused, hold the potential to deliver the type of innovations Dr. Shah alluded to in his speech today. As researchers in the U.S. and around the world are poised to build on this recent momentum, lawmakers looking to find common ground on how to spur the economy both in the U.S. and in the developing world have a great place to start in global health R&D. As Dr. Shah noted today, U.S. foreign assistance is not just USAID’s tag line of “from the American people” but also “for the American people” in part because U.S. assistance helps develop the “markets of the future.”

NOTE: Dr. Shah also recently spoke about HIV vaccine R&D and IAVI’s efforts to find an AIDS Vaccine. Excerpts of his comments can be seen on IAVI’s YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/IAVIVideos

MFAN Statement: USAID Administrator’s Tough Speech Heralds New Development Business Model

Wednesday, January 19th, 2011
Bookmark and Share

Raj Shah

MFAN Statement: USAID Administrator’s Tough Speech Heralds New Development Business Model

January 19, 2010 (WASHINGTON)This statement is delivered on behalf of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN) by Co-Chair David Beckmann:

In an extraordinary and hard-hitting speech today, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Administrator Raj Shah laid out the clear progress that is being made in changing the U.S. approach to development and reforming his agency, which has been a target of strong criticism in recent years.  The reform agenda is essential and timely, because helping struggling people build livelihoods and escape poverty has never been more critical to our success in battling extremism, opening new markets for U.S. products, and strengthening America’s allies around the world.

Administrator Shah’s message was unmistakable: America needs to take a more business-like approach to development, and everyone involved in the enterprise must be more focused on results and hold themselves to a higher standard of accountability.  While emphasizing that development “is as critical to our economic prospects and our national security as diplomacy and defense,” he explained that these reforms “are not trying to build an updated version of a traditional aid agency… we are seeking to build something greater: a modern development enterprise.”

He hammered home this message and echoed President Obama’s vision for development with perhaps the most important idea in the speech: that over time, our foreign assistance will create “efficient local governments, thriving civil societies and vibrant private sectors,” thereby making countries more accountable to their citizens while helping them “graduate” from U.S. assistance.  Administrator Shah also helped put the issue in context for the American people, noting that our long-term competiveness and global leadership is contingent on how well we reach and sell products to the world’s fastest growing economies in places like Africa.  Development is a key ingredient to helping these markets stabilize and grow, when used effectively in tandem with diplomacy and trade, among other things.

We were pleased that Administrator Shah did more than simply reiterate a vision in his speech; he actually detailed the steps that USAID will take by:

  • Making sustainable economic growth and empowered local citizens core goals across all USAID development efforts;
  • Moving to save hundreds of millions of dollars over the next five years by consolidating staffing, administrative, and program management activities globally;
  • Accelerating negotiations to graduate as many as seven countries from U.S. assistance by 2015;
  • Creating a new evaluation framework that will help USAID make decisions on what programs to continue, while also communicating results to the American people through the new USAID Dashboard;
  • Unveiling a new procurement system that will increase competitiveness; and
  • Establishing a new taskforce to prevent waste, fraud and corruption.

Taken together, these reforms will bring U.S. development efforts firmly into the 21st-century and help strengthen USAID as the effective leader of those efforts.  We urge Administrator Shah to remain laser-focused on this reform agenda, including by reaching out to bipartisan Members of Congress to develop legislation that will enshrine this new development business model in law in order to drive long-term results.

For additional information, please contact Sam Hiersteiner at 202-295-0171 or shiersteiner@gpgdc.com.

A Banker’s Perspective on Development: MFAN Partners respond to MCC CEO’s Major Policy Speech

Tuesday, January 18th, 2011
Bookmark and Share

Last week, MFAN Partner the Center for American Progress teamed up with the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research to host a joint event: The Road to Better Aid: An Emerging Bipartisan Consensus? Daniel Yohannes, CEO of the Millennium Challenge Corporation, gave the keynote address followed by a panel discussion with MFAN Principal John Norris, Executive Director of the Sustainable Security and Peacebuilding Initiative at CAP and Mauro De Lorenzo, Visiting Fellow at AEI. Philip I. Levy, Resident Scholar at AEI moderated the discussion.

Yohannes gave a straightforward speech, making a direct appeal for better use of taxpayer dollars. “I have a client – the U.S. taxpayer.  I have a partner – the countries receiving MCC assistance and the citizens they represent.  And, I have a goal – to get the best return on America’s investment,” he said.

MFAN Partner, the U.S. Guntitledlobal Leadership Coalition, highlighted Yohannes’ remarks on their Global Impact blog, saying “Yohannes drew on his own background as a banker, focusing on the importance of a good return on investment for the U.S. taxpayer. President Obama’s global development policy calls for sustainable economic growth in well-governed partner countries that will enact reforms to ensure government accountability and create favorable business conditions in the private sector. Yohannes said, ‘MCC’s rigorous approach requires that we only invest in those proposals with the strongest potential to reduce poverty and increase incomes.  This enables us to answer the fundamental question of aid effectiveness: Do the expected results from our investment justify the use of scarce aid dollars?’”

Sarah Jane Staats, Director of Policy Outreach at MFAN Partner the Center for Global Development, reviewed Yohannes’ speech last week on their Rethinking Foreign Assistance blog.

“Yohannes, in a departure from speeches I have heard him give before, focused on the MCC’s role in the broader U.S. development policy landscape and the attributes that distinguish the MCC mission and way of doing business. He outlined five development ideas that have broad political support inside and outside the Beltway:

-America’s global leadership should include leadership on development challenges.

-U.S. development should focus on economic growth.

-Accountability and selectivity matter.

-Countries are partners not clients.

-Real results and impact are key, not how much is spent.

He said the Obama administration’s new global development policy is focused on putting these principles into action, and that ‘of course, we have been practicing them at MCC for the last seven years.’”

To read CEO Yohannes speech, titled “Investing in Development: On the Road to Better Aid, MCC is Paving the Way” click here.