blog logo image

Posts Tagged ‘hunger’

UPDATE: USAID Administrator Poll Leaders, New Ideas

Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009
Bookmark and Share

Nearly a week into the poll we launched on who should be the next USAID Administrator, three names have risen to the top (though fans can still vote for their favorite nominee and change the course of this race!).

Birdsallgaylesmith2692510897_8c651a8c9acolin-powell-in

Currently leading with 15% of the vote is Nancy Birdsall (left), president of the Washington-based think tank Center for Global Development. Birdsall has worked with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the Inter-American Development Bank, and spent 14 years at the World Bank.

She is followed closely by Gayle Smith (center), senior director at the NSC, with 14%. This is Smith’s second stint with the NSC, having previously served under the Clinton Administration. She was most recently with the think tank Center for American Progress and has also worked at USAID.

Right behind her is former Secretary of State Colin Powell (right) at 12%.  Powell served as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under President George H.W. Bush and later as Secretary of State for President George W. Bush. He also spent time at the Departments of Defense and Energy under President Carter.

Heading up the middle of the pack is former Republican Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE) at 7%, followed by a four-way tie at 6% — Acting USAID Administrator Alonzo Fulgham, Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates, CARE CEO Helene Gayle, and Center for Strategic & International Studies Senior Adviser Ric Barton.

Of course, even with 20 choices in our poll, we are bound to leave somebody out.  In the comments section for our original blog post on the poll, we’ve received some interesting ideas about who else should be considered for the USAID job:

  • Former USAID Administrator Andrew Natsios, who served under President George W. Bush, was suggested by kitty hempstone, who writes, “Where is Andrew Natsios on this list? He knows the problems, the players and, probably most import [sic] right now, how to get things moving again…”
  • Another name recommended by a couple of respondents is Rufus Phillips, who led a special counterinsurgency effort for USAID in Vietnam. Bert Fraleigh writes, “There is one possible candidate for Administrator who stands head and shoulders above any other American in qualifications and experience and that is Rufus Phillips !!! He carries no adverse political baggage and is available…” Harvey Neese adds in agreement, “The only person I can think of to head the infamous USAID at this time is Rufe Phillips. He knows counterinsurgency which is what is needed with all the turmoil in developing countries.”

Who else should be in the running for USAID Administrator? Let us know now!

White House Joins the Party on Development Policy

Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009
Bookmark and Share

obama-signs-bill

President Obama has called for an interagency review of all U.S. global development policy, a major declaration that the White House is thinking seriously about how the U.S. engages with poor countries to promote development, including foreign aid.

This effort comes on the heels of the State Department’s announcement earlier this summer that it will undertake a Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review, the first of its kind. State is already leading on the Global Food Security Initiative, and senior reviews are underway for the White House’s Global Health Initiative.

Not to be outdone, Congress has also weighed in from both sides of the Capitol. In the House, Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Howard Berman (D-CA) introduced the Initiating Foreign Assistance Reform Act (H.R. 2139) in the spring alongside Rep. Mark Kirk (R-IL), a bill calling for the President to craft a National Strategy for Global Development. The legislation has garnered over 100 bipartisan cosponsors so far.

Moreover, Berman has begun putting together a blueprint for a wholesale rewrite of the onerous and outdated Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, the legislation governing most U.S. foreign aid that has not been revisited since 1985.

In the Senate, Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry (D-MA), Ranking Member Dick Lugar (R-IN), along with committee members Sens. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) and Bob Corker (R-TN), have introduced their own bill, the Foreign Assistance Revitalization and Accountability Act (S.1524), to rebuild the U.S. Agency for International Development and strengthen evaluation of foreign aid programs.

Now if an invitation could go out to the next USAID Administrator to come to the party…

Here’s a sampling of what leading development voices had to say in response to news about the Presidential Study Directive on global development:

“Our nation does not now have a clear statement of goals related to world hunger, poverty and disease,” said Rev. David Beckmann, president of Bread for the World and co-chair of MFAN. “Currently our nation’s global development programs and policies are scattered across 12 departments, 25 different agencies, and nearly 60 government offices.”

“This is a tremendous step in the right direction,” said Dr. Reuben Brigety, director of the Sustainable Security Program at the Center for American Progress. “It will fulfill a campaign promise of President Obama’s to change our approach to developing countries, and will help to reassert our moral leadership in the world.”

“The U.S. Global Leadership Coalition applauds President Obama for his Presidential Study Directive on U.S. Global Development Policy as another step toward making our civilian-led tools of development and diplomacy stronger and more effective,” said USGLC Executive Director Liz Schrayer.

White House leadership of the exercise is important given the convening power necessary to secure high-level participation by the more than two dozen government entities currently responsible for portions of U.S. development policy,” said Sheila Herrling, senior policy analyst at the Center for Global Development.

Testimony of Rev. David Beckmann, President, Bread for the World Before SFRC Hearing

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009
Bookmark and Share

 

July 22, 2009

Chairman Kerry, Ranking Member Lugar, and members of the Committee, thank you for inviting me to testify. I am David Beckmann, president of Bread for the World, a collective Christian voice urging our nation’s decision makers to end hunger at home and abroad. I also serve as co-chair of the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network, a broad coalition of groups and individuals working to make U.S. foreign aid more effective in support of global development and the reduction of poverty.

I am grateful for this hearing and for the draft legislation that Senators Kerry, Lugar, Menendez, and Corker have developed. I especially appreciate the fact that you are working in a bipartisan way on this issue. The institutional changes you legislate will be better and more long-lasting if members of both parties, conservatives and liberals, contribute their points of view.

Now is the time for foreign aid reform. President Bush led a major expansion of foreign aid, and President Obama proposes to double foreign aid. A substantial majority of U.S. voters favor spending more on effective programs to reduce hunger, poverty, and disease in developing countries. It’s the right thing to do and the smart thing to do. But we all know that foreign aid could be spent more effectively. If this administration and Congress manage to improve the effectiveness of U.S. assistance, our dollars will more good for decades to come, and voters will continue to support increases in funding.

In a recent survey, 85 percent of registered voters agreed that we “need to modernize how foreign assistance is currently organized and implemented.” In a poll last November – in the depths of the economic crisis – 87 percent agreed that “in a time like this, we need to make foreign assistance more efficient and get more of our aid to people who really need it.”

I applaud the Obama administration and this Congress for the attention you have already devoted to international development, including foreign assistance reform. When I testified before this Committee in March, you were considering the terrible setback in progress against world hunger that has taken place over the last several years. You passed the Global Food Security Act. In his inaugural address, President Obama promised people in poor countries to “help make your farms flourish,” and the administration – led by Secretary Clinton – has now launched a global food security initiative. The President was able to convince the other G8 nations to work with the United States to help farmers in poor countries increase their production.

The administration’s 2010 budget request puts us on the path to doubling foreign assistance by 2015, including a major investment in global health and increased investment in agriculture. The administration’s budget also proposes to bolster the capacity of USAID and the State Department to carry out their development and diplomatic missions.

Secretary Clinton recently announced that the State Department and USAID are undertaking a quadrennial diplomacy and development review (QDDR). It will provide a short-, medium- and long-term blueprint for our country’s diplomatic and development efforts. This process will articulate a clear statement of foreign policy and development objectives, recommend management and organizational reforms, and propose performance measures. The QDDR process will incorporate perspectives from across the government, from Congress, and from nongovernmental experts.

The House of Representatives has already passed a State Department Reauthorization Bill and a Pakistan bill. Chairman Howard Berman’s stated priority for this Congress is foreign assistance reform, and, as of today, a bipartisan group of 83 members of the House have signed on as cosponsors of the Initiating Foreign Assistance Reform Act, H.R. 2139. Mr. Berman’s staff are already working on a rewrite of the Foreign Assistance Act.

Chairman Kerry, in your foreign policy address at the Brookings Institution in May you articulated the case for strengthening U.S. diplomacy and development assistance. With regard to foreign assistance reform, you called for clear goals, improved coordination, stronger development expertise and capacity, streamlined laws to untie the hands of aid professionals, and the empowerment of country teams to shape programs based on local needs.

The draft legislation you have now developed with Senators Lugar, Menendez, and Corker is a major step forward. I love the statement of policy. It calls for a reform of USAID and related agencies in order to better serve the U.S. commitment to global development and the reduction of poverty and hunger.

Much of your bill is focused on building the capacity of USAID, which is urgently required. USAID’s operational capacity has decayed. It no longer has budgeting or planning authority. It is not currently represented on the National Security Council. The Administrator position is still vacant, partly because several candidates have declined to take charge of such a weak agency.

Under this administration, the State Department has demonstrated a deep commitment to global development and poverty reduction. But it is crucial that some funding be dedicated single-mindedly to development. When we try to achieve defense and diplomatic goals with the same dollars, aid is usually much less effective in reducing poverty. In my mind, that’s the basic reason we need a strong development agency, with its own capacity to plan and carry out programs. These programs should be coordinated with other foreign policy purposes, but distinct from them.

Your bill’s section on transparency is especially important. President Obama has called for an “elevated, streamlined, and empowered 21st century U.S. development agency” that will be “accountable, flexible, and transparent.” The reform of U.S. foreign assistance gives us a chance to create a development agency that will be transparent to all Americans – to encourage public support and involvement in global poverty reduction and to facilitate public-private partnerships. Even more importantly, the transparency section of the bill will help people in developing countries know about U.S. assistance programs. If local people are more aware and involved, our aid programs will be more effective.

My main request is that you introduce this bill as soon as possible. Quite a few organizations have helped their networks across the country understand that foreign assistance reform is important to future gains against hunger, poverty, and disease. These organizations include Bread for the World and many religious groups, InterAction, Oxfam, the ONE Campaign, Save the Children, Women Thrive Worldwide, Mercy Corps, CARE, the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition, World Wildlife Fund, the Centre for Development and Population Activities (CEDPA), the Center for Health and Gender Equity (CHANGE), the International Center for Research on Women, the International Women’s Health Coalition, the Global AIDS Alliance, and RESULTS. Our coalition also includes opinion leaders at the Center for Global Development, the Center for American Progress, and Brookings. Thus, tens of thousands of people around the country are now informed and eager for a chance to have their say. Once your bill is introduced, they can ask their senators to cosponsor, thus building broad support for this Committee’s work on foreign assistance reform.

As I said at the outset, now is the time for foreign assistance reform, and the main reason is leadership. We have a President and Secretary of State who are committed to reducing hunger and poverty in the world and to making our programs of assistance more effective. Your counterparts in the House have demonstrated their leadership on this issue. And this Committee has demonstrated exceptional ability to work together across the aisle on complex issues that are important to our nation and the world.

May God continue to bless your leadership.